Saturday, August 7, 2010

Collections Checklist: How to Collect Past-Due Accounts

While having a small accounts-receivable balance indicates good
financial management, (around 1.5% to 2.5% of your gross income),
collecting past-due balances is a displeasing aspects of business.
Studies show that 75% of receivables that are 3 months delinquent are
paid. However, this number drops to 56% after 6 months. Therefore
your delay in collecting past-due accounts will reduce your chance of
receiving payment. This checklist should help you reduce the stress
of collecting past-due accounts:


Encourage customers to pay sooner by offering discounts for early payments. For example, offer a 2% discounts for accounts
paid within 10 days rather than 30 days. Keep an eye on the calendar for tax refund season.

Keep an eye on the calendar for tax refund season. Most customers want to pay their bills and will pay if they have the money.

After 30 days of no payment, add a service charge. Contact your attorney to ensure that you do not exceed your state's usury statutes and federal law.

Make a personal visit to the customer to discuss past-due accounts. Remember, that you value the client-relationship.

Call your customer when personal visits are not possible. Appeal to your customer's business sense while respecting the valuable client relationship. For example, try "I'm the smallest of the smallest. I can't play the role of bank because I am so small." When you talk with your customer, offer some solutions. Give your client a way out of this uncomfortable situation.

Play "good cop/bad cop". Ask your secretary or partner to call on your behalf. This allows you to maintain the client relationship, while collecting your account. Ideally, the client will be so grateful to talk to you, the "good cop", so they will not have to talk with the "bad cop".

Send a series of reminder letters. The first letter should include the following statements:


Acknowledge your goal of providing high-quality services and a concern that your valued client has allowed his/her account to lapse

You are aware of his/her delinquent account status

Contact you promptly or his/her credit status is in jeopardy (include your contact information)

The total amount due

Pay this amount to avoid sending the account to a collection attorney. Say, "we regret having to take this action, but must do so"

Thank you in advance for settling this matter

Your subsequent letters should include several choice boxes:

I am sending a check on _________.

This is part of the bill to show good faith.

Here's the whole amount; now stop calling me.

File suit in small claims court. In Philadelphia, the maximum amount allowed for small claims is $10,000. Corporations and associations with less than a $2500 claim, do not need an attorney to represent them in small claims court.If the past-due amount is more than allowed by the small claims court, then contact your attorney to file a lawsuit to collect the account.

Friday, August 6, 2010

Benefits of Buying Omaha Foreclosure Homes and Tips to Make a Purchase

There are several benefits of purchasing Omaha Foreclosure Homes. It is the largest city in the state of Nebraska and is well recommended as a residential area due to several reasons. Omaha Foreclosure Homes are also available at considerable discounts.Several tips will help the buying of foreclosed homes in Omaha easier.

The various benefits of buying Omaha Foreclosure Homes are listed as follows:

1. Financial assistance to first time buyers: The State Housing department offers various financial incentives for first time buyers bent upon purchasing foreclosed homes such as down payment assistance and cheap loan facilities.

2. Youth Employment Programs- the City has been expanding employment opportunities for youth through its Department of Community Development.

3. The City founded on The Missouri River has been given the name Gateway to The West. Its central location makes it a transportation hub and a good place to do business in.

4. It provides a great level of employment opportunities being home to several Fortune 500 companies like Con Agra Foods, Union Pacific Corporation etc.

5. Green City: due to its environment friendly programs, the city has been ranked one of the Greenest cities in USA on the basis of Low air and water pollution.

6. Most Livable Region: the city has been voted as one of the best livable regions in the US with Redbook magazine including it in its Ten Best cities for Working Mothers and Parenting Magazine calling it one of the Top Ten Cities in the Nation to raise a Family on the basis of its various utilities and amenities.

7. Diverse Recreation options: Residents have a great range of recreation options such as Trails at Fontenelle Forest, a variety of restaurants and Bistros, and various live theatre, music, dance and off Broadway productions. The Henry Doorly Zoo is a popular attraction.

8. Affordable Housing: Omaha Foreclosure Homes come at a steep discount from market rates making them an alluring investment.

The Combination of low crime rate, solid public school system, and above benefits have made investing in Omaha Foreclosure homes a wise idea.

You must follow the following tips while buying Omaha Foreclosure Homes:

• Keep track of listings of foreclosed properties- Keep abreast of foreclosure listings from public records, online listings, local realtors' listings etc.

• Shortlist 5-10 properties that match your taste and budget

• Once you zero in on a property, verify its documents using the services of a lawyer

• Do a background check of the property using a house-inspector for any repairs or taxes and liens outstanding

• Assess the properties in the neighborhood to get a fair idea of the property value

• Bargain with the seller or make your bid at the foreclosure auction.

Thus numerous benefits and helpful tips will make decision to purchase Omaha Foreclosure Homes easier.

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Need to Search For Free Criminal Court Cases in Kansas City? Here is How to Do it From Home

Are you looking for how to lookup free criminal cases in Kansas city? Kansas City refers to two cities and a metropolitan area situated at the confluence of the Kansas and Missouri Rivers but how do you lookup criminal court cases in this state? There are times when you need to find out if a particular person residing in Kansas city has had a criminal record but you just do not know how to go about it.

Maybe the person is someone you want to hire and you need to make sure that he or she does not have a criminal history. If the person has lived or worked in Kansas City it only makes sense to conduct a search for court records in Kansas City. This article shows how to locate and obtain criminal court cases in Kansas City.

Just before you start searching for court records at a courthouse or on a court record database, you could ascertain if this person you are conducting a search on has actually been involved in a criminal case by searching the person's name on the Internet. There are some newspapers on the Internet that have a segment in their papers for crime related information and they would print names and dates of cases. An online search using a popular search engine would be able to detect, through the archives of the newspapers online if this person has had any criminal history.

There are different ways of searching for criminal court cases. The first way is to visit the courthouses in the locality you are interested in searching in - in this case Kansas City - and making a formal request for the court record. To do this you must have the name of the person involved, their social security number and if possible the court case number.

This process, however, may take some time as the court custodians probably have to search through piles of files on court records. Also, you might be required to pay a processing fee for the court records you want. And you may not be given the information you need because such information are not meant for the public. Another method of searching for criminal records is by conducting a search for criminal court cases using the internet.

The Kansas State website, Kansas.gov has a link to the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, from which you could find criminal history records. Also a link to kscourts.com can be found on a site for the judiciary courts. There are also third-party sites on the internet that could help you get the court records you seek. These websites will charge you a fee to get the details you need but they are always very reliable and the fee is less than $40 per search.

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Hospice Fraud - A Review For Employees, Whistleblowers, Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms

Hospice fraud in South Carolina and the United States is an increasing problem as the number of hospice patients has exploded over the past few years. From 2004 to 2008, the number of patients receiving hospice care in the United States grew almost 40% to nearly 1.5 million, and of the 2.5 million people who died in 2008, nearly one million were hospice patients. The overwhelming majority of people receiving hospice care receive federal benefits from the federal government through the Medicare or Medicaid programs. The health care providers who provide hospice services traditionally enroll in the Medicare and Medicaid programs in order to qualify to receive payments under these government programs for services rendered to Medicare and Medicaid eligible patients.

While most hospice health care organizations provide appropriate and ethical treatment for their hospice patients, because hospice eligibility under Medicare and Medicaid involves clinical judgments which may result in the payments of large sums of money from the federal government, there are tremendous opportunities for fraudulent practices and false billing claims by unscrupulous hospice care providers. As recent federal hospice fraud enforcement actions have demonstrated, the number of health care companies and individuals who are willing to try to defraud the Medicare and Medicaid hospice benefits programs is on the rise.

A recent example of hospice fraud involving a South Carolina hospice is Southern Care, Inc., a hospice company that in 2009 paid $24.7 million to settle an FCA case. The defendant operated hospices in 14 other states, too, including Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin. The alleged frauds were that patients were not eligible for hospice, to wit, were not terminally ill, lack of documentation of terminal illnesses, and that the company marketed to potential patients with the promise of free medications, supplies, and the provision of home health aides. Southern Care also entered into a 5-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with the OIG as part of the settlement. The qui tam relators received almost $5 million.

Understanding the Consequences of Hospice Fraud and Whistleblower Actions

U.S. and South Carolina consumers, including hospice patients and their family members, and health care employees who are employed in the hospice industry, as well as their SC lawyers and attorneys, should familiarize themselves with the basics of the hospice care industry, hospice eligibility under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and hospice fraud schemes that have developed across the country. Consumers need to protect themselves from unethical hospice providers, and hospice employees need to guard against knowingly or unwittingly participating in health care fraud against the federal government because they may subject themselves to administrative sanctions, including lengthy exclusions from working in an organization which receives federal funds, enormous civil monetary penalties and fines, and criminal sanctions, including incarceration. When a hospice employee discovers fraudulent conduct involving Medicare or Medicaid billings or claims, the employee should not participate in such behavior, and it is imperative that the unlawful conduct be reported to law enforcement and/or regulatory authorities. Not only does reporting such fraudulent Medicare or Medicaid practices shield the hospice employee from exposure to the foregoing administrative, civil and criminal sanctions, but hospice fraud whistleblowers may benefit financially under the reward provisions of the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732, by bringing false claims suits, also known as qui tam or whistleblower suits, against their employers on behalf of the United States.

Types of Hospice Care Services

Hospice care is a type of health care service for patients who are terminally ill. Hospices also provide support services for the families of terminally ill patients. This care includes physical care and counseling. Hospice care is normally provided by a public agency or private company approved by Medicare and Medicaid. Hospice care is available for all age groups, including children, adults, and the elderly who are in the final stages of life. The purpose of hospice is to provide care for the terminally ill patient and his or her family and not to cure the terminal illness.

If a patient qualifies for hospice care, the patient can receive medical and support services, including nursing care, medical social services, doctor services, counseling, homemaker services, and other types of services. The hospice patient will have a team of doctors, nurses, home health aides, social workers, counselors and trained volunteers to help the patient and his or her family members cope with the symptoms and consequences of the terminal illness. While many hospice patients and their families can receive hospice care in the comfort of their home, if the hospice patient's condition deteriorates, the patient can be transferred to a hospice facility, hospital, or nursing home to receive hospice care.

Hospice Care Statistics

The number of days that a patient receives hospice care is often referenced as the "length of stay" or "length of service." The length of service is dependent on a number of different factors, including but not limited to, the type and stage of the disease, the quality of and access to health care providers before the hospice referral, and the timing of the hospice referral. In 2008, the median length of stay for hospice patients was about 21 days, the average length of stay was about 69 days, almost 35% of hospice patients died or were discharged within 7 days of the hospice referral, and only about 12% of hospice patients survived longer than 180 days.

Most hospice care patients receive hospice care in private homes (40%). Other locations where hospice services are provided are nursing homes (22%), residential facilities (6%), hospice inpatient facilities (21%), and acute care hospitals (10%). Hospice patients are generally the elderly, and hospice age group percentages are 34 years or less (1%), 35 - 64 years (16%), 65 - 74 years (16%), 75 - 84 years (29%), and over 85 years (38%). As for the terminal illness resulting in a hospice referral, cancer is the diagnosis for almost 40% of hospice patients, followed by debility unspecified (15%), heart disease (12%), dementia (11%), lung disease (8%), stroke (4%) and kidney disease (3%). Medicare pays the great majority of hospice care expenses (84%), followed by private insurance (8%), Medicaid (5%), charity care (1%) and self pay (1%).

As of 2008, there were approximately 4,700 locations which were providing hospice care in the United States, which represented about a 50% increase over ten years. There were about 3,700 companies and organizations which were providing hospice services in the United States. About half of the hospice care providers in the United States are for-profit organizations, and about half are non-profit organizations.
General Overview of the Medicare and Medicaid Programs

In 1965, Congress established the Medicare Program to provide health insurance for the elderly and disabled. Payments from the Medicare Program arise from the Medicare Trust fund, which is funded by government contributions and through payroll deductions from American workers. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), previously known as the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), is the federal agency within the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that administers the Medicare program and works in partnership with state governments to administer Medicaid.

In 2007, CMS reorganized its ten geography-based field offices to a Consortia structure based on the agency's key lines of business: Medicare health plans, Medicare financial management, Medicare fee for service operations, Medicaid and children's health, survey & certification and quality improvement. The CMS consortia consist of the following:

• Consortium for Medicare Health Plans Operations
• Consortium for Financial Management and Fee for Service Operations
• Consortium for Medicaid and Children's Health Operations
• Consortium for Quality Improvement and Survey & Certification Operations

Each consortium is led by a Consortium Administrator (CA) who serves as the CMS's national focal point in the field for their business line. Each CA is responsible for consistent implementation of CMS programs, policy and guidance across all ten regions for matters pertaining to their business line. In addition to responsibility for a business line, each CA also serves as the Agency's senior management official for two or three Regional Offices (ROs), representing the CMS Administrator in external matters and overseeing administrative operations.

Much of the daily administration and operation of the Medicare Program is managed through private insurance companies that contract with the Government. These private insurance companies, sometimes called "Medicare Carriers" or "Fiscal Intermediaries," are charged with and responsible for accepting Medicare claims, determining coverage, and making payments from the Medicare Trust Fund. These carriers, including Palmetto Government Benefits Administrators (hereinafter "PGBA"), a division of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina, operate pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395h and 1395u and rely on the good faith and truthful representations of health care providers when processing claims.

Over the past forty years, the Medicare Program has enabled the elderly and disabled to obtain necessary medical services from medical providers throughout the United States. Critical to the success of the Medicare Program is the fundamental concept that health care providers accurately and honestly submit claims and bills to the Medicare Trust Fund only for those medical treatments or services that are legitimate, reasonable and medically necessary, in full compliance with all laws, regulations, rules, and conditions of participation, and, further, that medical providers not take advantage of their elderly and disabled patients.

The Medicaid Program is available only to certain low-income individuals and families who must meet eligibility requirements set forth by federal and state law. Each state sets its own guidelines regarding eligibility and services. Although administered by individual states, the Medicaid Program is funded primarily by the federal government. Medicaid does not pay money to patients; rather, it sends payments directly to the patient's health care providers. Like Medicare, the Medicaid Program depends on health care providers to accurately and honestly submit claims and bills to program administrators only for those medical treatments or services that are legitimate, reasonable and medically necessary, in full compliance with all laws, regulations, rules, and conditions of participation, and, further, that medical providers not take advantage of their indigent patients.

Medicare & Medicaid Hospice Laws Which Affect SC Hospices

Hospice fraud occurs when hospice organizations, by and through their employees, agents and owners, knowingly violate the terms and conditions of the applicable Medicare and Medicaid hospice statutes, regulations, rules and conditions of participation. In order to be able to recognize hospice fraud, hospices, hospice patients, hospice employees and their attorneys and lawyers must know the Medicare laws and requirements relating to hospice care benefits.

Medicare's two main sources of authorization for hospice benefits are found in the Social Security Act and the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. The statutory provisions are primarily found at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395d, 1395e, 1395f(a)(7), 1395x(d)(d), and 1395y, and the regulatory provisions are found at 42 C.F.R. Part 418.

To be eligible for Medicare benefits for hospice care, the patient must be eligible for Medicare Part A and be terminally ill. 42 C.F.R. § 418.20. Terminal illness is established when "the individual has a medical prognosis that his or her life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course." 42 C.F.R. § 418.3; 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d)(d)(3). The patient's physician and the medical director of the hospice must certify in writing that the patient is "terminally ill." 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7); 42 C.F.R. § 418.20. After a patient's initial certification, Medicare provides for two ninety-day benefit periods followed by an unlimited number of sixty-day benefit periods. 42 U.S.C. § 1395d(a)(4). At the end of each ninety- or sixty-day period, the patient can be re-certified only if at that time he or she has less than six months to live if the illness runs its normal course. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(A). The written certification and re-certifications must be maintained in the patient's medical records. 42 C.F.R. § 418.23. A written plan of care must be established for each patient setting forth the types of hospice care services the patient is scheduled to receive, 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(B), and the hospice care has to be provided in accordance with such plan of care. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(C); 42 C.F.R. § 418.56. Clinical records for each hospice patient must be maintained by the hospice, including plan of care, assessments, clinical notes, signed notice of election, patient responses to medication and therapy, physician certifications and re-certifications, outcome data, advance directives and physician orders. 42 C.F.R. § 418.104.

The hospice must obtain a written notice of election from the patient to elect to receive Medicare hospice benefits. 42 C.F.R. § 418.24. Importantly, once a patient has elected to receive hospice care benefits, the patient waives Medicare benefits for curative treatment for the terminal disease upon which is the admitting diagnosis. 42 C.F.R. § 418.24(d).

The hospice must designate an Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) or groups composed of individuals who work together to meet the physical, medical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs of the hospice patients and families facing terminal illness and bereavement. 42 C.F.R. § 418.56. The IDG members must provide the care and services offered by the hospice, and the group, in its entirety, must supervise the care and services. A registered nurse that is a member of the IDG must be designated to provide coordination of care and to ensure continuous assessment of each patient's and family's needs and implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. The interdisciplinary group must include, but is not limited to, the following qualified and competent professionals: (i) A doctor of medicine or osteopathy (who is an employee or under contract with the hospice); (ii) A registered nurse; (iii) A social worker; and, (iv) A pastoral or other counselor. 42 C.F.R. § 418.56.

The Medicare hospice regulations, at 42 C.F.R. § 418.200, summarize the requirements for hospice coverage in pertinent part as follows:

To be covered, hospice services must meet the following requirements. They must be reasonable and necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness as well as related conditions. The individual must elect hospice care in accordance with §418.24. A plan of care must be established and periodically reviewed by the attending physician, the medical director, and the interdisciplinary group of the hospice program as set forth in §418.56. That plan of care must be established before hospice care is provided. The services provided must be consistent with the plan of care. A certification that the individual is terminally ill must be completed as set forth in section §418.22.

The Social Security Act, at 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(a), limits Medicare hospice benefits, providing in pertinent part as follows: "Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, no payment may be made under part A or part B for any expenses incurred for items or services-... (C) in the case of hospice care, which are not reasonable and necessary for the palliation or management of terminal illness...." 42 C.F.R. § 418.50 (hospice care must be "reasonable and necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness"). Palliative care is defined in the regulations as "patient and family-centered care that optimizes quality of life by anticipating, preventing, and treating suffering. Palliative care throughout the continuum of illness involves addressing physical, intellectual, emotional, social, and spiritual needs and to facilitate patient autonomy, access to information, and choice." 42 C.F.R. § 418.3.

Medicare pays hospice agencies a daily rate for each day a beneficiary is enrolled in the hospice benefit and receives hospice care. The daily payments are made regardless of the amount of services furnished on a given day and are intended to cover costs that the hospice incurs in furnishing services identified in the patient's plan of care. There are four levels of payments which are made based on the amount of care required to meet beneficiary and family needs. 42 C.F.R. § 418.302; CMS Hospice Fact Sheet, November 2009. These four levels, and the corresponding 2010 daily rates, are as follows: routine home care ($142.91); continuous home care ($834.10); inpatient respite care ($147.83); and, general inpatient care ($635.74).

The aggregate annual cap per patient in 2009 was $23,014.50. This cap is determined by adjusting the original hospice patient cap of $6,500, set in 1984, by the Consumer Price Index. See CMS Internet-Only Manual 100-04, chapter 11, section 80.2; 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(i); 42 C.F.R. § 418.309. The Medicare Claims Processing Manual, at Chapter 11 - Processing Hospice Claims, in Section 80.2, entitled "Cap on Overall Hospice Reimbursement," provides in pertinent part as follows: "Any payments in excess of the cap must be refunded by the hospice."

Hospice patients are responsible for Medicare co-insurance payments for drugs and respite care, and the hospice may charge the patient for these co-insurance payments. However, the co-insurance payments for drugs are limited to the lesser of $5 or 5% of the cost of the drugs to the hospice, and the co-insurance payments for respite care are generally 5% of the payment made by Medicare for such services. 42 C.F.R. § 418.400.

The Medicare and Medicaid programs require institutional health care providers, including hospice organizations, to file an enrollment application in order to qualify to receive the programs' benefits. As part of these enrollment applications, the hospice providers certify that they will comply with Medicare and Medicaid laws, regulations, and program instructions, and further certify that they understand that payment of a claim by Medicare and Medicaid is conditioned upon the claim and underlying transaction complying with such program laws and requirements. The Medicare Enrollment Application which hospice providers must execute, Form CMS-855A, states in part as follows: "I agree to abide by the Medicare laws, regulations and program instructions that apply to this provider. The Medicare laws, regulations, and program instructions are available through the Medicare contractor. I understand that payment of a claim by Medicare is conditioned upon the claim and the underlying transaction complying with such laws, regulations, and program instructions (including, but not limited to, the Federal AKS and Stark laws), and on the provider's compliance with all applicable conditions of participation in Medicare."

Hospices are generally required to bill Medicare on a monthly basis. See the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, at Chapter 11 - Processing Hospice Claims, in Section 90 - Frequency of Billing. Hospices generally file their hospice Medicare claims with their Fiscal Intermediary or Medicare Carrier pursuant to the CMS Claims Manual Form CMS 1450 (sometime also called a Form UB-04 or Form UB-92), either in paper or electronic form. These claim forms contain representations and certifications which state in pertinent part that: (1) misrepresentations or falsifications of essential information may serve as the basis for civil monetary penalties and criminal convictions; (2) submission of the claim constitutes certification that the billing information is true, accurate and complete; (3) the submitter did not knowingly or recklessly disregard or misrepresent or conceal material facts; (4) all required physician certifications and re-certifications are on file; (5) all required patient signatures are on file; and, (6) for Medicaid purposes, the submitter understands that because payment and satisfaction of this claim will be from Federal and State funds, any false statements, documents, or concealment of a material fact are subject to prosecution under applicable Federal or State Laws.

Hospices must also file with CMS an annual cost and data report of Medicare payments received. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(i)(3); 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d)(d)(4). The annual hospice cost and data reports, Form CMS 1984-99, contain representations and certifications which state in pertinent part that: (1) misrepresentations or falsifications of information contained in the cost report may be punishable by criminal, civil and administrative actions, including fines and/or imprisonment; (2) if any services identified in the report were the product of a direct or indirect kickback or were otherwise illegal, then criminal, civil and administrative actions may result, including fines and/or imprisonment; (3) the report is a true, correct and complete statement prepared from the books and records of the provider in accordance with applicable instructions, except as noted; and, (4) the signing officer is familiar with the laws and regulations regarding the provision of health care services and that the services identified in this cost report were provided in compliance with such laws and regulations.

Hospice Anti-Fraud Enforcement Statutes

There are a number of federal criminal, civil and administrative enforcement provisions set forth in the Medicare statutes which are aimed at preventing fraudulent conduct, including hospice fraud, and which help maintain program integrity and compliance. Some of the more prominent enforcement provisions of the Medicare statutes include the following: 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b (Criminal fraud and anti-kickback penalties); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a and 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-8 (Civil monetary penalties for fraud); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7 (Administrative exclusions from participation in Medicare/Medicaid programs for fraud); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-4 (Administrative subpoena power for the Comptroller General).

Other criminal enforcement provisions which are used to combat Medicare and Medicaid fraud, including hospice fraud, include the following: 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (General health care fraud criminal statute); 21 U.S.C. §§ 353, 333 (Prescription Drug Marketing Act); 18 U.S.C. § 669 (Theft or Embezzlement in Connection with Health Care); 18 U.S.C. § 1035 (False statements relating to Health Care); 18 U.S.C. § 2 (Aiding and Abetting); 18 U.S.C. § 3 (Accessory after the Fact); 18 U.S.C. § 4 (Misprision of a Felony); 18 U.S.C. § 286 (Conspiracy to defraud the Government with respect to Claims); 18 U.S.C. § 287 (False, Fictitious or Fraudulent Claims); 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Criminal Conspiracy); 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements); 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Mail Fraud); 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud); 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (Money Laundering); 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (Money Laundering); and, 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO")).

The False Claims Act (FCA)

Hospice fraud whistleblowers may benefit financially under the reward provisions of the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732, by bringing false claims suits, also known as qui tam or whistleblower suits, against their employers on behalf of the United States. The plaintiff in a hospice fraud whistleblower suit is also known as a relator. The most common FCA provisions upon which hospice fraud qui tam or whistleblower relators rely are found in 31 U.S.C. § 3729: (A) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval; (B) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim; (C) conspires to commit a violation of subparagraph (A), (B), (D), (E), (F), or (G);..., and, (G) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the Government, or knowingly conceals or knowingly and improperly avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the Government.... There is no requirement to prove specific intent to defraud. Rather, it is only necessary to prove actual knowledge of the false claims, false statements, or false records, or the defendant's deliberate indifference or reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. 31 U.S.C. § 3729(b).

The FCA anti-retaliation provision protects the hospice whistleblower from retaliation from the hospice when the employee (or a contractor) "is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment" for taking action to try to stop the fraudulent activity. 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h). A hospice employee's relief includes reinstatement, 2 times the amount of back pay, interest on the back pay, and compensation for any special damages sustained as a result of the discrimination or retaliation, including litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

A SC hospice fraud FCA whistleblower would initially file a disclosure statement, complaint and supporting documents with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Columbia, South Carolina, and the US Attorney General. After the disclosures are filed, a federal court complaint can be filed. The SC division where the frauds occurred, the relator's residence, and the defendant residence, will determine which division the case will be assigned. There are eleven federal court divisions in South Carolina. Once the case has been filed, the government has 60 days to decide whether or not to intervene. During this time, federal government investigators located in South Carolina will investigate the claims. If the case involved Medicaid, SC Medicaid fraud unit investigators will likely become involved as well. If the government intervenes in the case, the U.S. Attorney for South Carolina is usually the lead attorney. If the government does not intervene, the relator's SC attorney will prosecute the case. In South Carolina, expect a qui tam case to take one to two years to get to trial.

Tips on Recognizing Hospice Fraud Schemes

The HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued Special Fraud Alerts for fraudulent and abusive practices of hospices. U.S. and South Carolina hospices, patients, hospice employees and whistleblowers, their attorneys and lawyers, should be familiar with these hospice fraud practices. Tips on recognizing hospice frauds in South Carolina and the U.S. are:

• A hospice offering free goods or goods at below market value to induce a nursing home to refer patients to the hospice.
• False representations in a hospice's Medicare/Medicaid enrollment form.
• A hospice paying "room and board" payments to the nursing home in amounts in excess of what the nursing home would have received directly from Medicaid had the patient not been enrolled in the hospice.
• False statements in a hospice's claim form (CMS Forms 1450, UB-04 or UB-92).
• A hospice falsely billing for services that were not reasonable or necessary for the palliation of the symptoms of a terminally ill patient.
• A hospice paying amounts to the nursing home for "additional" services that Medicaid considered included in its room and board payment to the hospice.
• A hospice paying above fair market value for "additional" non-core services which Medicaid does not consider to be included in its room and board payments to the nursing home.
• A hospice referring patients to a nursing home to induce the nursing home to refer its patients to the hospice.
•A hospice providing free (or below fair market value) care to nursing home patients, for whom the nursing home is receiving Medicare payment under the skilled nursing facility benefit, with the expectation that after the patient exhausts the skilled nursing facility benefit, the patient will receive hospice services from that hospice.
• A hospice providing staff at its expense to the nursing home to perform duties that otherwise would be performed by the nursing home.
• Incomplete or no written Plan of Care was established or reviewed at specific intervals.
• Plan of Care did not include an assessment of needs.
• Fraudulent statements in a hospice's cost report to the government.
• Notice of Election was not obtained or was fraudulently obtained.
• RN supervisory visits were not made for home health aide services.
• Certification or Re-certification of terminal illness was not obtained or was fraudulently obtained.
• No Plan of care was included for bereavement services.
• Fraudulent billing for upcoded levels of hospice care.
• Hospice did not conduct a self-assessment of quality and care provided.
• Clinical records were not maintained for every patient.
• Interdisciplinary group did not review and update the plan of care for each patient.

Recent Hospice Fraud Enforcement Cases

The DOJ and U.S. Attorney's Offices have been active in enforcing hospice fraud cases.

In 2009, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals settled an FCA lawsuit by paying $1.8 million to the federal government. The defendant allegedly failed to obtain written certifications of terminal illness for a number of its patients.

In 2006, Odyssey Healthcare, a national hospice provider, paid $12.9 million to settle a qui tam suit for false claims under the FCA. The hospice fraud allegations were generally that Odyssey billed Medicare for providing hospice care to patients when they were not terminally ill and ineligible for Medicare hospice benefits. A Corporate Integrity Agreement was also a part of the settlement. The hospice fraud qui tam relator received $2.3 million for blowing the whistle on the defendant.

In 2005, Faith Hospice, Inc., settled claims an FCA claim for $600,000. The hospice fraud allegations were generally that Faith Hospice billed Medicare for providing hospice care to patients more than half of whom were not terminally ill.

In 2005, Home Hospice of North Texas settled an FCA claim for $500,000 regarding allegations of fraudulently billing Medicare for ineligible hospice patients.

In 2000, Michigan osteopath Donald Dreyfuss, who pleaded guilty to criminal fraud charges, including violation of the AKS for receiving illegal kickbacks from a hospice for recommending the hospice to the staff of his nursing home, settled an FCA suit for $2 million.

Conclusion

Hospice fraud is a growing problem in South Carolina and throughout the United States. South Carolina hospice patients, hospice employees, and their SC lawyers and attorneys, should be familiar with the basics of the hospice care industry, hospice eligibility under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and typical hospice fraud schemes. Hospice organizations should take steps to ensure full compliance with Medicare/Medicaid hospice billing requirements to avoid hospice fraud allegations and FCA litigation.

© 2010 Joseph P. Griffith, Jr.

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Christian Sex - Does a Long Passionate Kiss Count As Cheating?

Jesus said that even if you only lust after a man or woman, without the physical contact, you have already committed adultery with that person in your heart. Just think how many times viewers of porn have committed adultery.

Matthew 5:27
You have heard that it was said to those of old, "You shall not commit adultery" But I say to you, whoever looks at a woman to lust for her, has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

Some may say that watching porn or lusting after a person without the physical act is totally harmless and it won't cause anyone to cheat, I disagree, its one thing to be happily married and you can still appreciate the beauty of another person without lusting whether that "hot babe" neighbor of yours in Apt 7A or that Mr. "McDreamy" you encounter each day on your way to work each morning, its another thing to lust after that co-worker or your spouse's best friend etc Not to mention the fact that watching porn is disrespectful to your spouse.

The more you think about having sex with someone other than your spouse, the more its burned into your mind and you start thinking of ways to make it a reality, the thought or image of you, engaged in hot and heavy sex with this person or even those porn pictures that you hide under the bed, is burned in your subconscious and it will make you want your spouse to imitate what you've seen or you'll try to seduce and have sex with the person you're lusting after.

The saying, out of the heart; the mouth speaketh is not an empty phrase.

What if you were chatting online with someone, and you felt that you had so much in common with,

"Wow, my spouse doesn't know me as well as you do, we just have this powerful connection" or maybe you were chatting back and forth,engaging in a lot of sexual banter trying to outdo each other about what you want to do to each other sexually and how fast or slow or long you want to do it, Meanwhile your spouse is innocently in the bedroom watching TV totally unaware of your sexual chat going on fast and furious just feet away in the next room,

Can you honestly say that that is not cheating and that its just bravado, having fun and it will never go anywhere, we've both set limits, we know how far to go? Do you really?

What if you were at work and you were talking to your co-worker, whom you've known for years, you've had the occasional "how are you?" over the years, but now you've had a few conversations with one another, you're feeling good about all the attention you're getting and the conversation

turns to sex and you end up sharing a long, slow,wet and passionate kiss and you feel bad about

it; but reason, "I won't let that happen again" My spouse doesn't have to know; it will only make things worse, what she/he doesn't know won't hurt her/him" Would that qualify as cheating?

You don't have to engage in physical contact to have committed adultery and even when it does get physical, whether a passionate kiss, a "loooonger" than usual hug or that "dirty talk" its still cheating. Physical Adultery, just like a toddler learning to walk, starts with very small steps, lust builds into fantasy and can lead into masturbation or going out to make your lust fantasy a reality.

Romans 12:2 says that we are to be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Replace those lustful thoughts with Godly thoughts, spend time in the word, ask God in prayer to forgive and take away the lustful thoughts.

Instead think about how I can be a better spouse, stir up some romance with your beloved spouse, you know the one who you pledged your undying love to before God and 250 of your closest friends and family at the wedding? Yeah That One :-)

Galatians 5:16-17
I say then, Walk in the spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh, For the flesh lusts against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to one another, so that you do not do the things that you wish. in other words guard your heart, cheating and sex in general is everywhere in the media, so you must be strong.

Your lust outside of your marriage could be a sign of bigger relationship problems you might be having with your spouse and that requires communication or if need be, christian counseling, it may be a part of one or both spouses not getting their needs met, as in emotionally or sexually; but it takes two people, making the effort to work out their marital problems, with God at the forefront for it to really work.

Cheating, whether physical or not can lead to violence, a feeling of betrayal, family dysfunction, emotionally scarred children, divorce and distance from God, God is of purer eyes than to look upon sin, The Bible says in Psalm 66:18 that if I regard iniquity in my heart, he (God) will not hear me. So if you're a cheater, you will likely get caught or if you are tempted to cheat, work on your marriage.

Proverbs 5:15
Drink water from your own cistern, in other words, Desire only your spouse sexually, you have your lovely bride or gorgeous hunk of a husband, why destroy your marriage and relationship with God by lusting for some floozy/jerk by thinking that the grass will be greener on the other side (it never is).

So what if the young woman paying attention to you is "hotter" than your wife. You're already taken and besides, outer physical beauty is only skin deep? So what if he has "Movie Star" looks, is 6ft4in and he makes you laugh and feel like a million bucks, lots of women will eat up the attention; but you don't have to, he probably won't really love you;but is rather trying to charm you out of your clothes. Love is not just a feeling; its a commitment.

Again, communicate any hangups you might have with each other, seek God Together and work it out and despite what a recent ABCNews column might say about cheating being more "culturally acceptable", it most definitely is not acceptable in God's eyes.

Monday, August 2, 2010

Convicted Felons and Handgun Ownership

There are a number of laws in place that bar an individual that has been convicted of a felony from owning or possessing "any firearm or ammunition." A felony is a crime with conviction that is eligible for a period of incarceration exceeding one year. When a person is convicted of a felony, he or she is unable to possess any firearm in any location by federal law. If a felon is found in possession of a firearm, the federal statutes recommend the punishment of incarceration for up to 10 years.

In addition to the main law against a felon owning or possessing a gun, there are a number of other statutes that have been written by the federal government that impose ownership restrictions. As an example, an individual who has been convicted of a misdemeanor domestic battery has his or her gun rights restricted. An individual who is currently the person for whom an order of protection has been issued also may not possess a weapon. While these statutes are currently legal, the 2008 Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller has cast a pall of uncertainty over all gun laws.

The statute that specifically bars convicted felons from owning a handgun or possessing a gun in general is 18 USC 921. This statute, like all statutes, is not a complete bar to gun ownership and comes with a number of exceptions to the general rule of "no guns for felons." The biggest exception to the rule is that individuals who have had their gun rights restored by their state are again allowed or able to own and to possess firearms. The state that restores the gun rights must be the same state that took away the rights through a felony conviction and incarceration in the first place. This means that a person convicted of a felony in Nevada is unable to apply to California to have his or her gun rights reinstated.

In addition to a state's rights to reinstate an individual's gun ownership rights, there are a couple of other exceptions in the statute. If a person is pardoned by the state for a wrongful conviction or some other reason, he or she no longer counts as a felon in the eyes of the gun ownership laws. Expunction, laying a conviction aside, and pardon generally remove an individual from the jurisdiction of the statute unless these things were qualified. The state can pardon a person for his or her crimes but leave in place the restriction on gun rights.

Sunday, August 1, 2010

How to Understand the Real Estate Market

Buying a home is often considered one of the greatest investments an individual will make in their lifetime. Possessing an individual mortgage builds equity, causing an individual to put away what could be considered their savings each month. These mortgage payments also build credit; give a buyer confidence and a sense of success. Not mentioning that an individual's home is a permanent place of shelter and safety.

Just like many investments, or equity building purchases, the consumer wants to buy at a low price and have the value increase so they can then have the option to sell at a high price making a profit on the investment. Even if one plans on staying in their home for the rest of their life, it is still beneficial for them to buy their home at the lowest possible price. Because it is so important to buy low and sell high, it is extremely important to understand the nature of the real estate market as a whole and especially in the local region where one is buying or selling. For example, the national average for real estate prices could have gone up a few percentage points, but it very likely could be a seller in Gilbert, Arizona is going to receive a great offer while in Cecile, Maine the market is actually depreciating.

There are many great resources available to an aspiring home buyer. One solid suggestion is to use a guide outlined by fortune magazine. The guide will take into account many aspects of an investors or consumers current financial situation. The most likely items to be considered will be the price of the home, the price of homes selling in the neighborhood over the last two years, the amount of down payment, the interest rate on the loan, and the length of time one is planning on staying in the home, etc.

As a word of caution, filing for bankruptcy is a harsh reality. Owning a home is an smart way to build credit if and only if one will be able to make the payments. If one cannot make the payments then purchasing the home is a possible detrimental decision, especially for credit. Some indicators that one might be at risk for going bankrupt might include bringing a child into the world, getting a divorce, looking for a job, too much consumer debt on credit cards, etc. Again, do not purchase a home if bankruptcy is at all likely.

The true secret to understanding the real estate market is to jump in and get experience. The first thing one can do to gain experience is to go to open houses and see what the new houses on the market are looking like, what their features are, how much they are selling for as they close. The second thing to do to get experience is to get pre-approved through a mortgage broker. Knowing what an individuals price range is gold. It will boost personal confidence and the confidence of the seller. The third thing is to find a real estate agent that one can trust and who will be absolutely reliable. A solid real estate agent will look out for the best interest of their clients, and pull through with some incredible advice. Lastly, develop a specific set of detailed items that are important and search diligently for the specific requirements using all the different sources available with technology today.